Well, I don’t agree with the take, but I appreciate you giving the subject both sides of the argument. I would fall into the category that they should be voted in for their sheer greatness and the fact that “cheating” in this context is, in my opinion, subjective. Show me the tests where these guys tested positive, show me the suspensions, and show me clear cut evidence and maybe I go the other way. But, for me, until I have all that, I put these guys in based on what they did on the field. In addition, as we discussed a bit on Facebook, these “crimes” are more crimes against their bodies than crimes against the game, in my opinion. We can, of course, agree to disagree, but I certainly enjoy the spirited debate.
Well, I don’t agree with the take, but I appreciate you giving the subject both sides of the argument. I would fall into the category that they should be voted in for their sheer greatness and the fact that “cheating” in this context is, in my opinion, subjective. Show me the tests where these guys tested positive, show me the suspensions, and show me clear cut evidence and maybe I go the other way. But, for me, until I have all that, I put these guys in based on what they did on the field. In addition, as we discussed a bit on Facebook, these “crimes” are more crimes against their bodies than crimes against the game, in my opinion. We can, of course, agree to disagree, but I certainly enjoy the spirited debate.